Respect for and promotion of human rights have come to be seen as the basis of legitimacy of modern Western civilization. There is nevertheless a striking contrast between our common view on the importance of rights and our profound disagreement on their meaning and content. This disagreement has become increasingly sharp in the last decades, due to the emergence of controversial new rights. This book offers an in-depth account of the most important moral debates, exploring the ethical and political foundations underlying the different understandings of rights. In the first part, the author focuses on the role played by the ideas of good and reason in the Thomistic-Aristotelian and Kantian traditions; and he compares those concepts with the main currents of contemporary liberalism, which, among other things, focus on our emancipation from the limits of nature. The book attempts to show the dehumanizing effects of denying the relevance of integral human good in defining the scope of human rights and liberties, and offers an alternative way forward for our understanding of human rights in a pluralistic society.Fernando Sim?n Yarza is Associate Professor of Constitutional Law at the University of Navarra (Spain). He has been a Visiting Scholar in the Universities of M?nster (Germany), Boston and Princeton. He has been awarded the prestigious Tom?s y Valiente Prize by the Constitutional Court of Spain. He is a member of the James Madison Society (Princeton University).
Between Desire and Reason is a very important and original contribution to what might be best called the natural-law civil liberties project, inaugurated in effect by John Finnis Natural Law and Natural Rights in 1980, and probably best exemplified by Robert P. Georges 1993 Making Men Moral. Sim?ns book is, in my judgment, the best book-length full-orbed treatment of contemporary problems in constitutional theory from this basic perspective since Georges magisterial text of 1993. The incol³…