Griffiths and Sanders present a fresh and wide-ranging analysis of the impact of the criminal process on medical practice.This collection of essays presents a fresh analysis of the increasing intervention of criminal law into medical practice, using evidence from previous cases alongside empirical data from a number of jurisdictions. It will be of interest to, among others, academics, healthcare practitioners and criminal lawyers.This collection of essays presents a fresh analysis of the increasing intervention of criminal law into medical practice, using evidence from previous cases alongside empirical data from a number of jurisdictions. It will be of interest to, among others, academics, healthcare practitioners and criminal lawyers.In recent years, debates have arisen concerning the encroachment of the criminal process in regulating fatal medical error, the implementation of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 and the recent release of the Director of Public Prosecution's assisted suicide policy. Consequently, questions have been raised regarding the extent to which such intervention helps, or if it in fact hinders, the sustained development of medical practice. In this collection, Danielle Griffiths and Andrew Sanders explore the operation of the criminal process in healthcare in the UK as well as in other jurisdictions, including the USA, Australia, New Zealand, France and the Netherlands. Using evidence from previous cases alongside empirical data, each essay engages the reader with the debate surrounding what the appropriate role of the criminal process in healthcare should be and aims to clarify and shape policy and legislation in this under-researched area.1. The 'doctoring type'; 2. 'The sleep of death': 150 years of anaesthesia-related mortality and the courts; 3. Victims and prosecution policy; 4. The road to the dock: prosecution decision-making in medical manslaughter cases; 5. Medical manslaughter: the role of context and charal3…