Since established by the Founding Fathers, the Electoral College was designated to be appoint the president to ensure that the voting process was anti-majoritarian in nature. However, with the advancements of technology allowing for a meaningful and engaged popular vote to ensure the U.S. is led by a president who received the most votes, the Founders concerns about the inability for the country to run a meaningful nationwide election are no longer relevant, leaving room for change. In
The Constant Two Plan: Reforming the Electoral College to Account for the National Popular Vote, Jay Wendland explores a novel approach to reforming the Electoral College to allocate for two electoral votes per state alongside the votes from the American public in order to bring the American presidential election process more in line with democratic norms and principles. Wedland demonstrates that the major extant reform plans in place would perform worse than the existing system and a new idea is needed.
The Constant Two Planremedies the small state bias, ensuring the popular vote winner becomes president, and acknowledges the federalist principle many have come to associate with the Electoral College.
Jay Wendlandis associate professor of political science at Daemen University.Wendland illuminates the context in which the Electoral College was created, the logic which undergirded it, and its subsequent history, laying bare the outdated assumptions, undemocratic character, and rickety vulnerability of a system for picking the president that devised in the 18th century Eric Burin, University of North Dakota
Acknowledgments
Chapter 1: How We Got This Messed-Up System
Chapter 2: Its Not Excellent, But Its Not All Bad
Chapter 3: 700 Attempts at Reform: Examining the Drawbacks of the Electoral College
Chapter 4: The Inherent Racism of the Electoral College: The Three-Fifths Compromise, Voter ID Laws, and Racial Inequality
Chapter 5: Weve Tried thil#Ö