Engineering Management of oil and gas projects provides guidance on effective management of the design effort including detailed engineering review and approval processes between the owner companies and the Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) contractorsies.
Introduction 1. The Project Lifecycle 2. Stage 1: Identification 3. Stage 2: Feasibility and Statement of Requirements 4. Stage 3: Definition-Front End Engineering Design (FEED) 5. Stage 4: Construction 6. Quality of FEED: Measuring it and managing it 7. Overarching issues 8. Case Studies: What they tell us 9. The Baywater OPCU Project. A risk not worth taking 10. When pipe thickness went wrong 11. When compressor selection went wrong 12. The importance of FEED data in oil & gas projects 13. Iron Sulphide and project failure 14. Provisions for future and associated pitfalls 15. Heat Exchanger and a project almost gone wrong 16. Too many unknowns-FEED gone wrong and its impacts 17. When FEED is uncertain contracting strategy can help References
Quite a large number of major oil and gas projects are failures with respect to their costs, schedules, and operational performance. Owner companies and contractors are struggling with the issues causing these failures. The Front End Engineering Design (FEED) has been identified as an important factor that plays a key role in determining the success of a project. However, the FEED and the associated Front End Loading (FEL) do not get the attention they deserve from the players in the business, namely, the owner companies, FEED, and EPC contractors. While academic studies on the FEL and its failures are available, how the seeds of failures are sown during an actual project FEED remains a mystery. The details are usually burlĂ.