An account of the origins and development of literary criticism in the turbulent seventeenth- and eighteenth-century print marketplace.A lively account of the ways in which literary criticism developed through the mid-seventeenth to the mid-eighteenth centuries, from the informal verbal responses of readers and playgoers, through engagement of authors in criticising each other's works, to the establishment of editors and book reviewers as official arbiters of literary taste.A lively account of the ways in which literary criticism developed through the mid-seventeenth to the mid-eighteenth centuries, from the informal verbal responses of readers and playgoers, through engagement of authors in criticising each other's works, to the establishment of editors and book reviewers as official arbiters of literary taste.Early literary criticism was undisciplined. Unlike the staid essays and monographs of later academic scholarship, English criticism first appeared in the contentious world of the London theater: dramatists and other poets argued about their craft in contending prefaces and dedications, and their disputes spilled into the public sphere in pamphlet wars, mock epics, lampoons, and even novels. Across these forms, criticism was personal, political, and unconcerned with analysis for its own sake. Yet this unruly discourse laid the groundwork both for modern literary criticism and for the discipline of literary studies. The Invention of English Criticism explores the earliest uses of criticism and the attempts by some to convert a field of literary debate into an archive of useful knowledge. Criticism's undisciplined past thus illuminates its contested, ambivalent, and never fully disciplined present.Introduction: the textualization of judgment; 1. Criticism and the institutions of drama, 164575; 2. Politics of Parnassus; 3. Women among critics; 4. Criticism and the poetry of Anne Finch; 5. Disciplining the dunces: literary knowledge in The Dunciad Variorum; 6. Bol“R