ShopSpell

Molyneux's Question Vision, Touch and the Philosophy of Perception [Paperback]

$47.99       (Free Shipping)
62 available
  • Category: Books (Psychology)
  • Author:  Morgan, Michael J.
  • Author:  Morgan, Michael J.
  • ISBN-10:  0521100674
  • ISBN-10:  0521100674
  • ISBN-13:  9780521100670
  • ISBN-13:  9780521100670
  • Publisher:  Cambridge University Press
  • Publisher:  Cambridge University Press
  • Pages:  228
  • Pages:  228
  • Binding:  Paperback
  • Binding:  Paperback
  • Pub Date:  01-May-2009
  • Pub Date:  01-May-2009
  • SKU:  0521100674-11-MPOD
  • SKU:  0521100674-11-MPOD
  • Item ID: 101427314
  • Seller: ShopSpell
  • Ships in: 2 business days
  • Transit time: Up to 5 business days
  • Delivery by: Jan 20 to Jan 22
  • Notes: Brand New Book. Order Now.
Dr Morgan examines the whole history of Molyneux's famous question to John Locke.If a man born blind were to gain his sight in later life would he be able to identify the objects he saw around him? Dr Morgan examines the whole history of this debate. He shows how this debate is involved in the development and eventual separation of philosophy and experimental psychology after the eighteenth century and considers why the original question is effectively still unanswered.If a man born blind were to gain his sight in later life would he be able to identify the objects he saw around him? Dr Morgan examines the whole history of this debate. He shows how this debate is involved in the development and eventual separation of philosophy and experimental psychology after the eighteenth century and considers why the original question is effectively still unanswered.If a man born blind were to gain his sight in later life would he be able to identify the objects he saw around him? Would he recognise a cube and a globe on the basis of his earlier tactile experiences alone? This was William Molyneux's famous question to John Locke and it was much discussed by English and French empiricists in the eighteenth century as part of the controversy over innatism and abstract ideas. Dr Morgan examines the whole history of this debate: Locke's own (negative) answer to the question, the contributions of Berkeley, Condillac, Diderot and Voltaire and the factual accounts of early cataract operations and modern laboratory studies. He shows how this debate is involved in the development and eventual separation of philosophy and experimental psychology after the eighteenth century and considers why the original question is effectively still unanswered. This is one problem-area with its intricate cluster of connected conceptual and technical difficulties which suggests the need for some reunion or at least collaboration between the two subjects.Preface; Introduction; 1. The background to MolyneulÅ
Add Review