In his third book on the semiotics of title sequences, Title Sequences as Paratexts, theorist Michael Betancourt offers an analysis of the relationship between the title sequence and its primary textthe narrative whose production the titles credit. Using a wealth of examples drawn from across film historyranging from White Zombie (1931), Citizen Kane (1940) and Bullitt (1968) to Prince of Darkness (1987), Mission: Impossible (1996), Sucker Punch (2011) and Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol. 2 (2017)Betancourt develops an understanding of how the audience interprets title sequences as instances of paranarrative, simultaneously engaging them as both narrative exposition and as credits for the production. This theory of cinematic paratexts, while focused on the title sequence, has application to trailers, commercials, and other media as well.
In his third book on the semiotics of title sequences, Title Sequences as Paratexts, theorist Michael Betancourt offers an analysis of the relationship between the title sequence and its primary textthe narrative whose production the titles credit. Using a wealth of examples drawn from across film historyranging from White ZombieList of Figures Acknowledgements 1 INTRODUCTION
Limina Anticipation and Recapitulation Problems of Cinematic Paratext
2 Narrative Exposition
Pseudo-Independence Intratextuality
3 Expositional Modes
The Allegory mode Lexical Expertise
4 The Comment mode
Narrative Futurity Intertextuality and Quotation
5 The Summary mode
Complex Summary Narrative Restatement
l³&