In?Aristotles Empiricism, Jean De Groot argues that an important part of Aristotles natural philosophy has remained largely unexplored and shows that much of Aristotles analysis of natural movement is influenced by the logic and concepts of mathematical mechanics that emerged from late Pythagorean thought. De Groot draws upon the pseudo-AristotelianPhysical ProblemsXVI to reconstruct the context of mechanics in Aristotles time and to trace the development of kinematic thinking from Archytas to the AristotelianMechanics. She shows the influence of kinematic thinking on Aristotles concept of power or potentiality, which she sees as having a physicalistic meaning originating in the problem of movement.
De Groot identifies the source of early mechanical knowledge in kinesthetic awareness of mechanical advantage, showing the relation of Aristotles empiricism to more ancient experience. The book sheds light on the classical Greek understanding of imitation and device, as it questions both the claim that Aristotles natural philosophy codifies opinions held by convention and the view that the cogency of his scientific ideas depends on metaphysics.
Jean De Groot is Associate Professor in the School of Philosophy at The Catholic University of America. She received her Ph.D. in the History of Science from Harvard University, where she studied early mechanics and ancient optics. She studied Neo-Platonism at the University of Paris, attending the seminar of Pierre Hadot, and Aristotelian natural philosophy at the Warburg Institute and the Institute for Classical Studies in London. At Catholic University, she teaches the logic and natural philosophy of Aristotle and twentieth century philosophy.?
Although Aristotles philosophy is generally considered empiricist (in?the sense?that he believes the ultimate source of knowledge is perception), a number of contemporary scholars have?denied that he held perception to be?thel“~