What is the soul of poetry? Perhaps the most influential answer comes from Aristotle’s Poetics, in which the writer regarded poetry as an instance of mimesis, a kind of representation or simulation. However, despite the significance he gave the term, Aristotle's use of the word mimesis was far from unequivocal, and over the centuries that have followed this inconsistency has stimulated a wealth of interpretations and debate. Tracking Poeticsfrom its birth in rhetorical studies to its reception across the centuries until romanticism, Mats Malm here examines the many different ways scholars—from Averroës to Schlegel—have understood mimesis, looking at how these various interpretations have led to very different definitions of the soul of poetry.
Mats Malmis professor of comparative literature at the University of Gothenburg.
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Introduction
The soul of poetry—the definition of mimesis
Mimetic variations
Overview
1. Aristotle
Two instances of mimesis
Poetics—rhetoric
Plato’s categories
Probability—verisimilitude
Points of departure
ADAPTATIONS
2. Averroës’s adaptation (12th–13th century)
The poetics of visuality
The place of metaphor
Averroës and the soul
The soul of poetry:muthosreplaced bylexis
3. Mathias Lincopensis: Representation and revelation (14th century)
Master Mathias on literary presentation
From mimesis torepresentatio: fiction boiled down to metaphor
Revelation and poetics
4. The Italian RlãÉ