Based on a mixed methods design it first quantitatively tests the relationships for the OECD countries in cross-sectional as well as panel designs.Does the territorial state organisation matter for effective policy making, and if so, in what way? So far, we know relatively little about its effects on policy making and policy outputs. Starting from the hypothesis that decentralised policy making has positive effects whereas federalism has a slightly negative impact on policy performance, this book systematically tests the independent and interdependent effects of different combinations of federal/unitary and decentralised/centralised structures of decision making and implementation. Based on a mixed methods design it first quantitatively tests the relationships for the OECD countries in cross-sectional as well as panel designs. In a second step, qualitative case studies are conducted for four countries: federal-centralised Austria, federal-decentralised Switzerland, unitary-decentralised Denmark, and unitary-centralised Ireland. The authors study two space-related policy areas, both with regard to the decision making and the implementation stage of the policy-making process: regional policy and transport policy.contentsList of Tables and Figures viiThe Authors ixAcknowledgements xAbbreviations xiChapter One: Introduction 1Chapter Two: Theory and Hypotheses 5Chapter Three: Research Design 15Chapter Four: Quantitative Analysis 17Chapter Five: Qualitative Analysis 33Chapter Six: Decision making in Federal and Unitary Countries 43Chapter Seven: The Logic of Policy Implementation in Centralised andDecentralised Countries 103Chapter Eight: Conclusion 167Appendices 171References 183Index 215About Andr? ?KaiserAndr? Kaiser is Professor of Comparative Politics at the University of Cologne and member of the Faculty of the International Max Planck Research School, the Cologne Graduate School in Management, Economics and Social Sciences and the Cologne Research Training Group. Pl“Ê