Sovereign Debt and Socio-Economic Rights Beyond Crisis: The Neoliberalisation of International Law [Hardcover]

Argues that the 'neoliberalisation' of international and EU law has been advanced in the wake of the Eurozone debt crisis.The book will be of interest to scholars in international law, human rights, socio-legal studies, political science and international relations, as well as to national and international policy makers. It also represents a valuable resource for postgraduate and advanced-level graduate classes, particularly in international law and human rights.The book will be of interest to scholars in international law, human rights, socio-legal studies, political science and international relations, as well as to national and international policy makers. It also represents a valuable resource for postgraduate and advanced-level graduate classes, particularly in international law and human rights.This book offers a distinctive critical discussion of the relationship between sovereign debt and socio-economic human rights in the context of the contemporary global neoliberal economic order, going beyond strictly 'post-crisis' approaches and emphasising the structural character and consistent growth of public and private indebtedness. It reflects on the implications of mounting debt for the actual ability of States to realise human rights in a world of escalating indebtedness, inequality and insecurity. It expands existing definitions of neoliberalism by reflecting in particular on neoliberalism's epistemological underpinnings, and provides a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the 2009 Greek debt crisis and the main elements of post-crisis developments in international and EU law, arguing that the 'neoliberalisation of law' has essentially been advanced in the wake of the Eurozone debt crisis.1. Introduction; 2. Sovereign Debt and Neoliberalism; 3. Socio-Economic rights and Neoliberalism; 4. Sovereign Debt and ESR in Greece (2009); 5. Conclusions; Bibliography.'Should and can international human rights law challenge neoliberalism's dominion exercised through lÃ?