• Home
  • Books
  • Law
  • Television Courtroom Broadcasting Effects: Th...
ShopSpell

Television Courtroom Broadcasting Effects: The Empirical Research and the Supreme Court Challenge [Hardcover]

$151.99       (Free Shipping)
100 available
  • Category: Books (Law)
  • Author:  Lambert, Paul
  • Author:  Lambert, Paul
  • ISBN-10:  0761860053
  • ISBN-10:  0761860053
  • ISBN-13:  9780761860051
  • ISBN-13:  9780761860051
  • Publisher:  UPA
  • Publisher:  UPA
  • Pages:  494
  • Pages:  494
  • Binding:  Hardcover
  • Binding:  Hardcover
  • Pub Date:  01-Jun-2013
  • Pub Date:  01-Jun-2013
  • SKU:  0761860053-11-MPOD
  • SKU:  0761860053-11-MPOD
  • Item ID: 106600174
  • Seller: ShopSpell
  • Ships in: 2 business days
  • Transit time: Up to 5 business days
  • Delivery by: Sep 29 to Oct 01
  • Notes: Brand New Book. Order Now.
Court and policy makers have increasingly had to deal withand sometimes even embracetechnology, from podcasts to the Internet. Televised courtroom broadcasting especially remains an issue. The debate surrounding the US Supreme Court and federal courts, as well as the great disparity between different forms of television courtroom broadcasting, rages on. What are the effects of television courtroom broadcasting? Does research support the arguments for or against? Despite three Supreme Court cases on television courtroom broadcasting, the common thread between the cases has not been highlighted. The Supreme Court in these cases maintains a common theme: there is not a sufficient body of research on the effects of televising courtroom proceedings to resolve the debate in a confident manner.Paul Lambert is a lawyer and academic specializing in media, intellectual property, and information technology law.

This book is a corrective. First, it recounts the arguments for and against television in courtrooms, and reveals most of them to be self-serving assertions with next to no evidence to support them. Second, it takes the claims and counterclaims seriously, and sets out a sensible approach to replace hot air with hard evidence. This topic is timely. Courts are under pressure to revise their rules. It will become the indispensable read for everyone interested in the topic. The Barrister

It recounts the arguments for and against. . . and reveals most of them to be self-serving assertions with next to no evidence to support them. . . it takes the claims and counterclaims seriously, and sets out a sensible approach to replace hot air with hard evidence. This topic is timely. Courts are under pressure to revise their rules. It will become the indispensible read for everyone interested in the topic. Malcolm M. Feeley, Claire Sanders Clements Dean's Professor, Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program, Boalt Hall, University of California Berkeley

QlS

Add Review