The European Crisis and the Transformation of Transnational Governance: Authoritarian Managerialism versus Democratic Governance [Paperback]

The debate on law, governance and constitutionalism beyond the state is confronted with new challenges. In the EU, confidence in democratic transnational governance has been shaken by the authoritarian and unsocial practices of crisis management. The ambition of this book, which builds upon many years of close co-operation between its contributors, is to promote a viable interdisciplinary alternative to these developments. Conflicts-law constitutionalism is a concept of transnational governance which derives democratic legitimacy from the supranational control of the external impact of national decision-making, on the one hand, and the co-operative responses to problem interdependencies on the other. The first section of the book contrasts Europe's new modes of economic governance and crisis management with the conditionality of international investments, and reflects upon the communalities and differences between emergency Europe and global exceptionalism. Subsequent sections substantiate the probl?matique of executive and technocratic rule, explore conflict constellations of prime importance in the fields of environmental and labour law, and discuss the impact and limits of liberalisation strategies. Throughout the book, European and transnational developments are compared and evaluated.In the EU, confidence in democratic transnational governance has been shaken by the authoritarian and unsocial practices of crisis management. This book promotes a viable interdisciplinary alternative to these developments.

Christian Joerges is Professor of Law and Society (part time) at the Hertie School of Governance, Berlin. He is also a Co-director of the Centre of Law and Politics at the University of Bremen.
Carola Glinski is a Researcher at the Collaborative Research Center 'Transformations of the State', at the University of Bremen.

At a time when European legal scholars are still wrestling with the theoretical and normative underpinnings of the post-crisis goverlƒ$