Notes: Brand New Item. Not shipped to AK, HI, APO, FPO, AE.
An exploration of the tension in Western thought between the secular belief in human moral self-sufficiency and Christian belief in reconciliation in history.
This substantially revised second edition of Revelation and Reconciliation, first published by Cambridge University Press in 1995, gives a fresh account of the intellectual breakdown of Christianity in the West. In contrast to the familiar focus on epistemological questions and the collision between reason and revelation, Stephen Williams argues that underlying this collision is a deeper conflict between belief in human moral self-sufficiency and Christian belief in reconciliation in history. Taking issue with thinkers including the philosopher of science, Michael Polanyi, and the theologian, Colin Gunton, the argument proceeds by examining the contributions of Descartes, Locke, Barth and Nietzsche before coming to conclusions on the theological reading of intellectual history and the prospects of revitalising a contemporary Christian belief in reconciliation in history.
Students of both theology and the history of modern thought will find in Williams' analysis an alternative interpretation of the balance of forces in post-Reformation Western thought with implications for how they should be addressed.GBIn this lively book, Stephen Williams challenges the conventional wisdom regarding Christian theology's responsibility for modern atheism, urging that Christianity's claim about God's historical act of reconciliation and forgiveness is at least as offensive in modern culture. It is an important proposal, rich with implications both for constructive theology and for plotting the history of modern religious thought.For Stephen Williams, not only is the epistemological charge brought against the seventeenth-century thinkers difficult to make stick, but it is clear also that the decisive change which takes place in the period has more to do with a conception of moral autonomy, and in particular lS8