The Monstrous Discourse in the Donald Trump Campaign: Implications for National Discourse provides a lens through which to explore the implications of the monster metaphor as applied to Trump during the 2016 presidential election. Analyzing the overt and buried usages of the monster metaphor in the medias and Trumps discourse, as well as the structure of the monster narrative generally, offers connections between the metaphor and the actions incited by its narrative. This book explores the ways in which this language also serves as a metaphor to understand the ecology of Trumps candidacy and the polarized responses drawn by his campaign, and considers its troubling implications for the future direction of national discourse.
Debbie Jay Williams is professor of language and literature at Abilene Christian University.
Kalyn L. Prince is graduate student in the English PhD program at the University of Oklahoma.
To this day, the 2016 presidential campaign seems an exercise in horror and the uncanny. Thus Williams and Prince treat it as a struggle over who was the metaphorical monster, and to what effect. They show how efforts to cast Donald Trump as monstrous mostly succumbed in the media to his own mini-narratives of monstrosityby the media, migrants, politicians, Hillary Clinton or women in general, and many others. Especially helpful is the authors explanation of audience contributions to making potent metaphors. Whether youre a fan or foe of metaphorsor monstersWilliams and Prince provide an engaging analysis. John S. Nelson, University of Iowa
The Monstrous Discourse in the Donald Trump Campaign: Implications for National Discourse is a sharp analysis of recent political discourse and the power of metaphors. It is a timely and important contribution to monster studies. Sara K. Howe, Southern New Hampshire University
Prince and Williams thoroughly and thoughtfully engage the potentially problematic presence of the monster