Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act [Hardcover]

The Human Rights Act 1998 is criticised for providing a weak protection of human rights. The principle of parliamentary legislative supremacy prevents entrenchment, meaning that courts cannot overturn legislation passed after the Act that contradicts Convention rights. This book investigates this assumption, arguing that the principle of parliamentary legislative supremacy is sufficiently flexible to enable a stronger protection of human rights, which can replicate the effect of entrenchment. Nevertheless, it is argued that the current protection should not be strengthened. If correctly interpreted, the Human Rights Act can facilitate democratic dialogue that enables courts to perform their proper correcting function to protect rights from abuse, whilst enabling the legislature to authoritatively determine contestable issues surrounding the extent to which human rights should be protected alongside other rights, interests and goals of a particular society. This understanding of the Human Rights Act also provides a different justification for the preservation of Dicey's conception of parliamentary sovereignty in the UK Constitution.This book argues that the principle of parliamentary legislative supremacy is sufficiently flexible to enable a stronger protection of human rights.Alison Young is a Fellow and Tutor in Law at Hertford College, Oxford.

...an academically valuable, as well as a very interesting book. It encouraged me to look at some topics in a new light and the focus on the significant role of interpretation, and on the potential of democratic dialogue, is welcome.
...the arguments and analysis in this work deserve to be read and widely so. European Public Law, Volume 17, Number 1

&the argument Young makes is a coherent and convincing one. Her discussion in chapter five of the sadly under-used theory of democratic dialogue in the context of the HRA is extremely compelling, with an admirable eye for the details of how dialogue would wlC.