Over the past century, presidential constructions of crises have spurred recurring redefinitions of U.S. interests, as crusading advance has alternated with realist retrenchment. For example, Harry Truman and George W. Bush constructed crises that justified liberal crusades in the Cold War and War on Terror. In turn, each was followed by realist successors, as Dwight Eisenhower and Barack Obama limited U.S. commitments, but then struggled to maintain popular support.
To make sense of such dynamics, this book synthesizes constructivist and historical institutionalist insights regarding the ideational overreactions that spur shifts across crusading excesses and realist counter-reactions. Widmaier juxtaposes what Daniel Kahneman terms the initial fast thinking popular constructions of crises that justify liberal crusades, the slow thinking intellectual conversionof such views in realist adjustments, and the tensions that can lead to renewed crises. This book also traces these dynamics historically across five periods as Wilsons overreach limited Franklin Roosevelt to a reactive pragmatism, as Trumans Cold War crusading incited Eisenhowers restraint, as Kennedy-Johnson Vietnam-era crusading led to Nixons revived realism, as Reagans idealism yielded to a Bush-Clinton pragmatism, and as George W. Bushs crusading was followed by Obamas restraint. Widmaier concludes by addressing theoretical debates over punctuated change, historical debates over the scope for consensus, and policy debates over populist or intellectual excesses.
This work will be of great interest to students and scholars of U.S. Foreign Policy
1. Constructing Crises, Converting Values, and Credibility Gaps 2. Wilsonian Transformations: Presidential Rhetoric and Crusading Internationalism 3. Constructing Cold War Consensus: Trumans Crusade and Eisenhowers Restraint 4. The Limits tolS)