How might the social sciences best be employed in the study of law, especially in light of today's legal climate of anti-foundationalism?Realistic Socio-Legal Theoryaddresses this question thoroughly and precisely. Drawing upon philosophical pragmatism to construct an epistemological and methodological foundation, this book formulates a framework for a realistic approach to socio-legal theory.
Brian Z. Tamanaha contrasts the strengths of his realistic approach with those of the major schools of socio-legal theory through application to many key issues in the field. He explores the problematic state of socio-legal studies, the relationship between behavior and meaning, the notion of legal ideology, the nature of the concept of law, the problem of indeterminacy in rule following and application, and the structure of judicial decision making.
Tamanaha's discussion is always clear and concise as he articulates a social theory of law that draws equally from legal theory and socio-legal studies. His book has much to offer those interested in the gathering and organization of knowledge about law and legal phenomena.
Foreword Introduction: The State of Socio-Legal Studies Pragmatism and Realistic Socio-Legal Studies Behaviourism and Interpretavism in Complement An Analytical Map of the Concept of Law A Social Theory of Law by Comparison to Legal Positivism The Internal-External Distinction and the Notion of a Practice Studies of Judicial Decision Making Legal Theory and the Practice of Judging Three Last Words 1. Introduction: The State of Socio-Legal Studies 2. Pragmatism and Realistic Socio-Legal Studies 3. Behaviourism and Interpretivism in Complement 4. An Analytical Map of the Concept of Law 5. A Social Theory of Law by Comparison to Legal Positivism 6. The Internal/External Distinction and the Notion of a `Practice' 7. Studies of Judicial Decision-Making 8. Legal Theory and the Practice ol)