Notes: Brand New Item. Not shipped to AK, HI, APO, FPO, AE.
This book traces how indigenista innovation gave way to stagnation as local opposition, shifting national priorities, and waning financial support took their toll.Stephen E. Lewisis a professor of history at California State University, Chico. He is the author ofThe Ambivalent Revolution: Forging State and Nation in Chiapas, 1910-1945and the coeditor ofThe Eagle and the Virgin: Nation and Cultural Revolution in Mexico, 1920-1940.[Lewis's] approach, grounded in painstaking archival work and the author's deep knowledge of the region, yields a superb analysis of the fraught relationship among revolutionary indigenism, Mexican anthropology, and Tzeltal and Tzotzil communities.--Ben Fallaw,American Historical ReviewOverall, Lewis has provided a rich, exhaustive account ofindigenismofrom the 1940s through the 1970s that will become required reading for anyone trying to understand Mexican rural politics during this time period.--Hispanic American Historical ReviewOverall, Lewis has provided a rich, exhaustive account ofindigenismofrom the 1940s through the 1970s that will become required reading for anyone trying to understand Mexican rural politics during this time period.--Hispanic American Historical ReviewA welcomed addition to the growing scholarship that attempts to make sense of Mexico's rapid decline as a continental leader on indigenous policies.--IK: Other Ways of KnowingRethinking Mexican Indigenismois one of but a few archive-based studies--and the first in English to focus on Chiapas--that treats indigenismo as a historical subject. Overall, Lewis's book is a fascinating portrait of how, in the author's words, 'an indigenista project that initially contemplated major structural reforms [. . .] ended up a widely criticized, largely ineffective bureaucracy that lost the support of the very people it purported to serve.'--Tribal College Journal of American Indian Higher EducationWell wril£#