Was the American Revolution fought to achieve abstract ideals of individual freedom or to serve economic interests? Both! is the answer provided by Prof. Thomas D. Curtis in this intriguing study. He shows how British policy, particularly as it related to the speculation in lands on the western frontier (in the Appalachias and the Ohio Valley), had the unintended effect of uniting diverse interests into a force for rebellion. The leaders included heavily indebted southern landowners (including George Washington), northern urban land speculators (including Benjamin Franklin), and wealthy northern merchants who feared, after 1773, that England would impose trade monopolies that would bankrupt them. Artisans, shopkeepers, and small-scale farmers were influenced by combinations of economic and ideological motives. Small-scale land-oriented interests consisted of the settlers who wanted cheap land for farming in the western frontier areas, but who were denied legal title to the Indian lands by British law.
Editors Introduction: Updating the Curtis Thesis 1
Riches, Real Estate, and Resistance: How Land Speculation, Debt, and Trade Monopolies Led to the American Revolution Thomas D. 30
Introduction 31
Chapter I. The Economic and Political Background 33
Chapter II. Economic Interest Groups and Western Land Speculation 54
Chapter III. Englands Colonial Land Policies, 1763 1767 84
Chapter IV. Englands Colonial Land Policies, 1768 1774 99
Chapter V. An Alliance of Interests Opposed to English Rule 124
Chapter VI. Summary and Conclusion 150
References 161
Appendix A: Proclamation of 1763 168
Appendix B: The Quebec Act of 1774 175
Index 183
Thomas D. Curtis is a retired professor olı