The rhetoric of cultural identity generally goes in two potential directions: One a universal line that insists on an overall pattern of integration and harmony among all peoples regardless of their differences, and the other a line which suggests that various cultures are so specific and different that they will eventually enter into clash, violence and war. Drawing upon Derrida's concept of differance, I will point out that such rhetoric as examples of current political discourses fail to open the concept of cultural identity through redefining its relationship with otherness. This will be accompanied by poetry of Rumi and Whitman to suggest that their literary language through its non-dialectic characteristics is familiar with the problematic of identity and has the ability to form a cross-cultural dialogue.
Sufism And Transcendentalismenvisages the possibility of dialogue against the background of political conflict.
Elham Shayeghis associate professor of English at the American University of Armenia.
Taking her cue from Derridas writing about diff?rance and hospitality, Elham Shayegh presents an enlightening comparative reading of the poetry of Rumi and Whitman, in order to model a less reified relationship between self and other than the one that tosses up rhetoricfrom all sidesabout a clash of civilizations. This is a hopeful book that deserves a readership in these difficult times. Keith Tuma, professor of English at Miami University, editor of Miami University Press
At a moment when cross cultural dialogue seems particularly strained, Sufism and Transcendentalism: A Poststructuralist Dialogue Between Rumi and Whitman is a timely reminder of the political possibilities of poetry. Working across disparate time periods and geographies, this book daringly refuses to make history the most important interpretive framework for poetry. In doing so, it revealed to me a Whitman whom I had never fully considered and forced me to rethink sl“¶