Notes: Brand New Item. Not shipped to AK, HI, APO, FPO, AE.
This book argues that the complex, anthropocentric, and often culture-specific meanings of words have been shaped directly by their history of 'utility' for communication in social life, and explores relations between language, communication, culture, and mind. It contains extensive data from the author's fieldwork on language and culture in Laos.This book argues that the complex, anthropocentric, and often culture-specific meanings of words have been shaped directly by their history of 'utility' for communication in social life. N. J. Enfield draws on semantic and pragmatic case studies from his extensive fieldwork in Laos to investigate a range of semantic fields including emotion terms, culinary terms, landscape terminology, and honorific pronouns, among many others. These studies form the building blocks of a conceptual framework for understanding meaning in language. The book argues that the goals and relevancies of human communication are what bridge the gap between the private representation of language in the mind and its public processes of usage, acquisition, and conventionalization in society. Professor Enfield argues that in order to understand this process, we first need to understand the ways in which linguistic meaning is layered, multiple, anthropocentric, cultural, distributed, and above all, useful.This wide-ranging account brings together several key strands of research across disciplines including semantics, pragmatics, cognitive linguistics, and sociology of language, and provides a rich account of what linguistic meaning is like and why.Conventions for linguistic examplesList of figures and tablesPreface1. Introduction2. Meanings are layered3. Meanings are multiple4. Meanings are anthropocentric5. Meanings are cultural6. Meanings are distributed7. Conclusion: Meanings are usefulReferencesIndexN. J. Enfieldis Professor of Linguistics at the University of Sydney, and a senior staff scientist at the Max Planck Institute, Nijmegen.l£Ì