ShopSpell

Argument Structure Representation and Theory [Paperback]

$78.99     $109.99    28% Off      (Free Shipping)
100 available
  • Category: Books (Philosophy)
  • Author:  Freeman, James B.
  • Author:  Freeman, James B.
  • ISBN-10:  9400735537
  • ISBN-10:  9400735537
  • ISBN-13:  9789400735538
  • ISBN-13:  9789400735538
  • Publisher:  Springer
  • Publisher:  Springer
  • Pages:  200
  • Pages:  200
  • Binding:  Paperback
  • Binding:  Paperback
  • Pub Date:  01-Feb-2013
  • Pub Date:  01-Feb-2013
  • SKU:  9400735537-11-SPRI
  • SKU:  9400735537-11-SPRI
  • Item ID: 100949398
  • List Price: $109.99
  • Seller: ShopSpell
  • Ships in: 5 business days
  • Transit time: Up to 5 business days
  • Delivery by: Jul 04 to Jul 06
  • Notes: Brand New Book. Order Now.
This monograph first presents a method of diagramming argument macrostructure, synthesizing the standard circle and arrow approach with the Toulmin model. A theoretical justification of this method through a dialectical understanding of argument, a critical examination of Toulmin on warrants, a thorough discussion of the linked-convergent distinction, and an account of the proper reconstruction of enthymemes follows.This monograph opens by presenting a method of diagramming argument macrostructure, synthesizing the standard circle and arrow approach with the Toulmin model. A theoretical justification follows, including an account of the proper reconstructon of enthymemes.

Preface.-?Chapter One An Approach to Argument Macrostructure.- Chapter Two The Dialectical Nature of ARGUMENT.- Chapter Three Toulmins Problematic Notion of Warrant.- Chapter Four The Linked-Convergent DistinctionA First Approximation.- Chapter Five Argument Structure and Disciplinary Perspective: The Linked-Convergent versus Multiple-Co-ordinatively Compound Distinctions.- Chapter Six The Linked-Convergent DistinctionRefining the Criterion.- Chapter Seven Argument Structure and Enthymemes.- Chapter Eight From Analysis to Evaluation.-References.-?Index.

This monograph presents a method of diagramming argument macrostructure, synthesizing the standard circle and arrow approach with the Toulmin model. A theoretical justification of this method through a dialectical understanding of argument, a critical examination of Toulmin on warrants, and a thorough discussion of the linked-convergent distinction follows. Discussion includes consideration of alternative understandings of? argument structure and its representation presented in Wigmores chart method, Pollocks inference graphs, and the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation. An account of the proper reconstruction of enthymemes and issues at the border of structural analysis versus evaluation of arguments concludels3

Add Review