This book explores decision making for members of Congress with state-level constituents weighing state versus national implementation and outcomes.The Federal Design Dilemma contributes to the study of public policy, political institutions, and administration with novel data and a straightforward explanation of how policies are delegated intergovernmentally. This book will appeal to those interested in the legislative process, constitutional authority and federalism, public affairs, and public policy.The Federal Design Dilemma contributes to the study of public policy, political institutions, and administration with novel data and a straightforward explanation of how policies are delegated intergovernmentally. This book will appeal to those interested in the legislative process, constitutional authority and federalism, public affairs, and public policy.The level of government responsible for implementing policies affects intent, services provided, and ultimate outcomes. The decision about where to locate such responsibility is the federal design dilemma faced by Congress. Taking a new approach to this delegation and decentralization, The Federal Design Dilemma focuses on individual members of Congress. Not only are these legislators elected by constituents from their states, they also consider the outcomes that will result from state-level versus national executive branch implementation of policies. Here, Pamela J. Clouser McCann documents congressional intergovernmental delegation between 1973 and 2010, and how individual legislators voted on decentralization and centralization choices. Clouser McCann traces the path of the Affordable Care Act from legislative proposals in each chamber to its final enactment, focusing on how legislators wrestled with their own intergovernmental context and the federal design of health insurance reform in the face of political challenges.1. The federal design dilemma - a puzzle of intergovernmental delegation; 2. A theory of federalăp