Many philosophers and psychologists argue that normal adult human beings possess a primitive or 'folk' psychological theory. Recently, however, this
theory
has come under challenge from the
simulation alternative
. This alternative view says that human bings are able to predict and explain each others' actions by using the resources of their own minds to simuate the psychological etiology of the actions of others. The thirteen essays in this volume present the foundations of theory of mind debate, and are accompanied by an extensive introduction.List of Contributors.
Acknowledgements.
Introduction: Martin Davies and Tony Stone.
1. Replication and Functionalism: Jane Heal.
2. Folk Psychology as Simulation: Robert M. Gordon.
3. Interpretation Psychologized: Alvin I. Goldman.
4. The Simulation Theory: Objectives and Misconceptions: Robert M. Gordon.
5. Folk Psychology: Simulation or Tacit Theory?: Stephen Stich and Shaun Nichols.
6. 'He thinks He Knows': And more Development Evidence Against the Simulation Role Taking Theory: Josef Perner and Deborah Howes.
7. Reply to Stich and Nichols: Robert M. Gordon.
8. Reply to Perner and Howes: Robert M. Gordon.
9. In Defense of Simulation Theory: Alvin I. Goldman.
10. From Simulation to Folk Pyschology: The Case for Development: Paul L.Harris.
11. Why the Child's Theory of Mind Really is a Theory: Alison Gopnik and Henry M. Wellman.
12. Reading the Eyes: Evidence for the Role of Perception in the Development of a Theory of Mind: Simon Baron-Cohen and Pippa Cross.
13. Theory, Observation, and Drama: Simon Blackburn.
References.
Index of Names.
Index of Subjectsló¬
![Folk Psychology The Theory of Mind Debate [Paperback]](/itemImage/2/3/4/6/2_815953.jpg "Folk Psychology The Theory of Mind Debate [Paperback] xxx")