Argues that international human rights and water laws provide legal bases for the right to water and its extraterritorial application.Focusing on the examples of shared river basins in Africa, this in-depth analysis examines co-riparian states' duties towards residents of other such states regarding the latter's human right to water and explores normative bases for holding states extraterritorially responsible for their roles in violations of human right to water abroad.Focusing on the examples of shared river basins in Africa, this in-depth analysis examines co-riparian states' duties towards residents of other such states regarding the latter's human right to water and explores normative bases for holding states extraterritorially responsible for their roles in violations of human right to water abroad.International human rights law has only recently concerned itself with water. Instead, international water law has regulated the use of shared rivers, and only states qua states could claim rights and bear duties towards each other. International human rights law has focused on its principal mission of taming the powers of a state acting territorially. Takele Soboka Bulto challenges the established analytic boundaries of international water law and international human rights law. By demonstrating the potential complementarity between the two legal regimes and the ensuing utility of regime coordination for the establishment of the human right to water and its extraterritorial application, he also shows that human rights law and the international law of watercourses can apply in tandem with the purpose of protecting non-national non-residents in Africa and beyond.1. Introduction; 2. The human right to water at the global level; 3. The human right to water in the African human rights system; 4. The human right to water and states' domestic obligations; 5. The human right to water and states' extraterritorial obligations; 6. Extraterritoriality of the human right to watlÓQ