This book examines two problems in private law which are posed by the 'Good Samaritan': First, is an intervener under a legal duty to come to the aid of a fellow human being and does he incur any criminal or tortious liability if he fails to do so? Second, having intervened, is an intervener entitled to reimbursement of expenses, remuneration, reward, or compensation for any loss he might have suffered? Does or should the remedy depend on the success of the intervention? The author examines and compares the varied responses of the Roman, French, German, and English legal systems to these problems.
PART I: LIABILITY FOR NONFEASANCE I. INTRODUCTION II. WHAT IS 'NONFEASANCE'? III. THEORETICAL JUSTIFICATIONS FOR DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN FEASANCE AND NONFEASANCE IV. LIABILITY FOR NONFEASANCE IN CONTINENTAL EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW V. LIABILITY FOR NONFEASANCE IN ENGLISH PRIVATE LAW VI. TOWARDS A MORE CONSISTENT APPROACH PART II: GRANTING A CLAIM TO THE INTERVENER VII. THE DIFFERENT MEASURES OF RECOVERY AND THEIR TERMINOLOGY VIII. THEORETICAL ARGUMENTS AGAINST GRANTING A REMEDY TO THE INTERVENER IX. THEORETICAL ARGUMENTS IN FAVOUR OF GRANTING A REMEDY TO THE INTERVENER X. THE CONTINENTAL DOCTRINE OF 'NEGOTIORUM GESTIO' XI. THE POSITION IN ENGLISH LAW XII. TOWARDS A GENERAL PRINCIPLE: USING THE EXISTING DOCTRINES? XIII. TOWARDS A NEW GENERAL PRINCIPLE EPILOGUE
Jeoren Kortmannhas been a lecturer in Roman Law at The Queen's College, Oxford and is at present Attorney at Law at Stibbe, Amsterdam, and a member of the Amsterdam Bar.