This groundbreaking work by leading social psychologists, who have all contributed in important ways to the psychology of group perception, focuses in particular on three interrelated issues: (1) whether groups are seen to be diverse or relatively homogeneous; (2) whether groups are seen as real and stable or only transitory and ephemeral; and (3) whether group membership derives from some essential quality of the members or rather is based on social constructions.V. Yzerbyt, C.M. Judd, O. Corneille,Perceived Variability, Entitativity, and Essentialism: Introduction and Overview. M.B. Brewer, Y. Hong, Q. Li,Dynamic Entitivity: Perceiving Groups as Actors. D.L. Hamilton,S.J. Sherman, J.S. Rodgers,Perceiving the Groupness of Groups: Entitativity, Homogeneity, Essentialism, and Stereotypes. N. Haslam, L. Rothschild, D. Ernst,Essentialism and Entitativity: Structures of Beliefs about the Ontology of Social Categories. M. Rothbart, B.Park,The Mental Representation of Social Categories: Category Boundaries, Entitativity, and Stereotype Change. V. Yzerbyt, C. Estrada, O. Corneille, E. Seron, S.Demoulin,Subjective Essentialism in Action: Self-anchoring and Social Control as Consequences of Fundamental Social Divides. J.E. Plaks, S.R. Levy, C.S.Dweck, S.J. Stroessner,In the Eye of the Beholder: Lay Theories and the Perception of Group Entitativity, Variability, and Essence. K.C. Klauer, K. Ehrenberg, I.Wegener,Components of Homogeneity: A Multiple-process Model of Social Categorization. C. McGarty,Forming Stereotypes of Entitative Groups. P.W. Linville, G.W.Fischer, From Basketball to Business: Expertise, Implicit Covariation, and Social Judgement. M. Rubin, M. Hewstone,R.J. Crisp, A. Voci, Z. Richards,Gender lƒ-