ShopSpell

Putting Metaphysics First Essays on Metaphysics and Epistemology [Paperback]

$84.99       (Free Shipping)
100 available
  • Category: Books (Philosophy)
  • Author:  Devitt, Michael
  • Author:  Devitt, Michael
  • ISBN-10:  0199576971
  • ISBN-10:  0199576971
  • ISBN-13:  9780199576975
  • ISBN-13:  9780199576975
  • Publisher:  Oxford University Press
  • Publisher:  Oxford University Press
  • Pages:  368
  • Pages:  368
  • Binding:  Paperback
  • Binding:  Paperback
  • Pub Date:  01-Jul-2010
  • Pub Date:  01-Jul-2010
  • SKU:  0199576971-11-MPOD
  • SKU:  0199576971-11-MPOD
  • Item ID: 101367067
  • Seller: ShopSpell
  • Ships in: 2 business days
  • Transit time: Up to 5 business days
  • Delivery by: Jul 06 to Jul 08
  • Notes: Brand New Book. Order Now.
The metaphysical part of this book is largely concerned with realism issues. Michael Devitt starts with realism about universals, dismissing Plato's notorious 'one over many' problem. Several chapters argue for a fairly uncompromisingly realist view of the external physical world of commonsense and science. Both the nonfactualism of moral noncognitivism and positivistic instrumentalism, and defl ationism about truth, are found to rest on an antirealism that is hard to characterize. A case is presented for moral realism. Various biological realisms are considered. Finally, an argument is presented for an unfashionable biological essentialism.

The second part of the book is epistemological. Devitt argues against the a priori and for a Quinean naturalism. The intuitions that so dominate armchair philosophy are empirical not a priori.

Throughout the book there is an emphasis on distinguishing metaphysical issues about what there is and what it's like from semantic issues about meaning, truth, and reference. Another central theme, captured in the title, is that we should put metaphysics first . We should approach epistemology and semantics from a metaphysical perspective rather than vice versa. The epistemological turn in modern philosophy, and the linguistic turn in contemporary philosophy, were something of disasters.

Through these articles, Devitt has consistently done more than perhaps anyone else to clarify what is at issue generally in the realism debates and to provide the strongest possible defences of realism in a number of different domains. Both realists and antirealists owe him a lot for this important contribution. Devitt's writing also always moves heavyweight intellectual objects in a way that is always clear, accessible, and devoid of any unnecessary jargon or technicalities. I hope that, like his realist views, his style too will continue to influence young philosophers. --Mind



Michael Devitt