Sexual Politics in the Work of Tennessee Williams Desire over Protest [Paperback]

Is Tennessee Williams a social writer at heart? Hooper questions this view, presenting a new interpretation of the dramatist.Hooper questions the now fashionable view that Williams was fundamentally a social writer passionately concerned about the state of twentieth-century America. Through detailed analysis of both canonical and recently discovered texts, this book indicates instead how Williams' work prioritises sexual power and the experience of the individual over party politics.Hooper questions the now fashionable view that Williams was fundamentally a social writer passionately concerned about the state of twentieth-century America. Through detailed analysis of both canonical and recently discovered texts, this book indicates instead how Williams' work prioritises sexual power and the experience of the individual over party politics.Michael S. D. Hooper reverses the recent trend of regarding Tennessee Williams as fundamentally a social writer following the discovery, publication and/or performance of plays from both ends of his career  the 'proletarian' apprentice years of Candles to the Sun and Not About Nightingales and the once overlooked final period of, amongst many other plays, The Red Devil Battery Sign. Hooper contends that recent criticism has exaggerated the political engagement and egalitarian credentials of a writer whose characters and situations revert to a reactionary politics of the individual dominated by the negotiation of sexual power. Directly, or more often indirectly, Williams' writing expresses social disaffection before glamorizing the outcast and shelving thoughts of political change. Through detailed analysis of canonical texts the book sheds new light on Williams' work, as well as on the cultural and social life of mid-twentieth-century America.Introduction; 1. Geiger-counters of rebellion; 2. There will be pity for the wild; 3. Desiring others; 4. Emotional roots; Conclusion; Bibliography. This book forced this reviewer to rethink lƒŒ