Lex Aeterna [Hardcover]

Martin Luther's theological revolution depended in a significant part upon the distinction between law and gospel. Within the last hundred years, several authors have reevaluated the reformer's understanding of this paradigm in light of its development within the Lutheran orthodox tradition. Some authors have argued that the Lutheran scholastic view of God's law departs from that of Luther. Specifically, it is contended that the Lutheran orthodox contended for a definition of the law which defines it as God's eternal will contradicts Luther's approach, wherein the law is defined almost exclusively in negative terms, as a temporal order to eventually be replaced and superseded by the gospel. In this work, Jordan Cooper argues for the continued validity of the Lutheran orthodox definition of the law. Throughout this text, he contrasts the perspective of Radical Lutheran theologians, like Gerhard Forde, with that of earlier Lutheran writers such as Martin Chemnitz and Johann Gerhard. It is argued that Forde's view is inadequate to address contemporary ethical and pastoral issues, and that the Lutheran scholastic doctrine of the law as God's eternal will remains a necessary concept for the contemporary church. --With his usual crisp, direct style, Jordan Cooper marches through the material of his latest conquest, tackling the place of the law within Lutheran teaching and practice--especially within the context of the pervasive influence of Gerhard Forde. The presentation of evidence is thorough and fair, and while Cooper's conclusions may not shock, where specific theologians are aligned with regard to this debate may well provoke some surprise. I will be recommending this book often.-- --Joel Biermann, MDiv, PhD, Professor of Systematic Theology, Concordia Seminary, St. Louis; author of A Case for Character and Wholly Citizens --Cooper clearly contrasts the Law/Gospel theology of the confessional Lutheran tradition with that of Forde. Cooper's compelling apologetic inclÃb