Making the Moral Case for Social Sciences Stemming the Tide [Hardcover]

The social sciences have a legitimacy problem in the modern world. The natural sciences are viewed as 'proper science' by journalists and policy-makers because they discover 'truths', make money, and help governments solve problems. In turn, defenders of the social sciences borrow the language of instrumentality, profit and policy impact. Karl Spracklen, by contrast, makes the moral case for the social sciences, arguing that they are a necessary social good capable of fighting inequality and revealing the workings of hegemonic power.

The social sciences have a legitimacy problem in the modern world. The natural sciences are viewed as 'proper science' by journalists and policy-makers because they discover 'truths', make money, and help governments solve problems. In turn, defenders of the social sciences borrow the language of instrumentality, profit and policy impact. Karl Spracklen, by contrast, makes the moral case for the social sciences, arguing that they are a necessary social good capable of fighting inequality and revealing the workings of hegemonic power.

Introduction
1. The Attack on Social Sciences
2. The Weakness of the Defence
3. The Moral Case for the Social Sciences
Conclusion

Karl Spracklen issues a clarion call for critical thinkers in all the social sciences to unite and fight. He argues that the social sciences inevitably lose when they accept the impact agenda that more easily fits the natural sciences and their associated technologies. This book shows that there is an alternative case for the social sciences. It is called critical thinking that has a lineage which runs from Ancient Greece and Rome, through Europe's renaissance and enlightenment, into modern social theories. The clarion call will certainly rouse many sociologists, but Spracklenls’