In constitutional theory, the convention of individual ministerial responsibility ensures the accountability of ministers to Parliament. In practice it is frequently used by government to limit rather than facilitate accountability. In this book Diana Woodhouse examines the divergence between theory and practice. She analyzes the situations in which ministers resign, the effectiveness of resignation as a means of accountability, and the abdication by ministers of responsibility. She includes detailed case studies of the resignations, actual and threatened, of Lord Carrington, Leon Brittan, Edwina Currie, David Mellor, James Prior, and Kenneth Baker that make this book especially pertinent to our understanding of the current political scene and to recent institutional changes within Parliament and government. By highlighting the present deficiencies and possible future failing in public accountability Woodhouse's study provides an essential complement to recent debates about constitutional reform.
I. The Convention of Individual Ministerial Responsibility 1. The Accountability of Ministers to Parliament 2. The Content of the Convention II Resignations and Non-resignations: The Operation of Individual Ministerial Responsibility in the 1980s and 1990s 3. The Requirement for Resignation 4. Resignations for Personal Fault: Political Errors 5. Resignations for Personal Fault: Private Indiscretion 6. Resignations for Departmental Fault 7. Cases of Non-resignation: Political Circumstances and Constitutional Obligations 8. Cases of Non-resignation: An Evasion of Ministerial Responsibility? 9. Conclusion: The Coincidence of Constitutional and Political Requirements III Changes Affecting the Operation of Individual Ministerial Responsibility 10. The Reform of the Select Committee System: An Attempt to Redress the Balance 11. Next Steps Agencies: Management Reform in the Civil Servil£%