This book studies beliefs about the good and how it is known, and how such beliefs shape claims about the moral law.This book considers whether the good can be known after the challenges of postmodernity. The author studies influential ancient thinkers and how they understood the good, giving special attention to modernity and why it failed to explain the good. This serves as a basis for understanding postmodernity and how it challenges the idea of a universal human good.This book considers whether the good can be known after the challenges of postmodernity. The author studies influential ancient thinkers and how they understood the good, giving special attention to modernity and why it failed to explain the good. This serves as a basis for understanding postmodernity and how it challenges the idea of a universal human good.The Natural Moral Law argues that the good can be known and that therefore the moral law, which serves as a basis for human choice, can be understood. Proceeding historically through ancient, modern, and postmodern thinkers, Owen Anderson studies beliefs about the good and how it is known, and how such beliefs shape claims about the moral law. The focal challenge is whether the skepticism of postmodern thinkers can be answered in a way that preserves knowledge claims about the good. Considering the failures of modern thinkers to correctly articulate reason and the good and how postmodern thinkers are responding to these failures, Anderson argues that there are identifiable patterns of thinking about what is good, some of which lead to false dichotomies. The book concludes with a consideration of how a moral law might look if the good is correctly identified.1. The postmodern challenge: from modernity to postmodernity; 2. Traditional natural law: differences in Aristotle and Aquinas; 3. Patterns in historical thinking about the good; 4. The challenge of modernity: religious wars and the need for universal law; 5. The challenges of naturalism: legaló.