A Pragmatic Approach to Libertarian Free Willargues that the kind of free will required for moral responsibility and just desert is libertarian free will. It is a source of great controversy whether such a libertarian view is coherent and whether we should believe that we have such free will. This book explains and defends Robert Kanes conception of libertarian free will while departing from it in certain key respects. It is argued that a suitably modified Kanean model of free will can be shown to be conceptually coherent. In addition, it is argued that while we lack sufficient epistemic grounds supporting belief in the existence of libertarian free will, we may still be justified in believing in it for moral reasons. As such, the book engages critically with the works of a growing number of philosophers who argue that we should jettison belief in the existence of desert-grounding free will and the practices of praise and blame and reward and punishment which it supports.
1. Introduction 2. Kanes Libertarian Theory 3. Libertarianism, Luck, and Manipulation Arguments 4. Kanean Libertarianism Examined 5. A Consideration of Alternative Event-causal Libertarian Models of Basic Free Actions 6. Moral Responsibility Denial and the Problem of Punishment 7. Libertarian Free Will and Moral Obligation 8. Hardheartedness and Libertarianism 9. Conclusion
In A Pragmatic Approach to Libertarian Free Will, John Lemos offers a resourceful and rigorous defense of Robert Kanes libertarian thlc,