ShopSpell

Preventing Prenatal Harm Should the State Intervene [Paperback]

$78.99     $109.99    28% Off      (Free Shipping)
100 available
  • Category: Books (Philosophy)
  • Author:  Mathieu, D., Morreim, E. Haavi
  • Author:  Mathieu, D., Morreim, E. Haavi
  • ISBN-10:  9401737452
  • ISBN-10:  9401737452
  • ISBN-13:  9789401737456
  • ISBN-13:  9789401737456
  • Publisher:  Springer
  • Publisher:  Springer
  • Binding:  Paperback
  • Binding:  Paperback
  • Pub Date:  01-Mar-2013
  • Pub Date:  01-Mar-2013
  • SKU:  9401737452-11-SPRI
  • SKU:  9401737452-11-SPRI
  • Item ID: 100985584
  • List Price: $109.99
  • Seller: ShopSpell
  • Ships in: 5 business days
  • Transit time: Up to 5 business days
  • Delivery by: Jul 05 to Jul 07
  • Notes: Brand New Book. Order Now.
The issues explored in this book have unfortunately come to be known as 'maternal-fetal conflicts'. The phrase is unsatisfactory because it is misleading: It places the emphasis on the well-being of the fetus instead of on the born child (who will bear the burden of any harm done prenatally); it assumes a conflict between a pregnant women and her offspring (while the issue is usually more complex and more broadly based); and it incorrectly implies that all pregnant women are appropriately regarded as mothers. For these reasons, I have chosen to avoid the phrase 'matern- fetal conflict' altogether, and will instead speak in terms of 'preventable prenatal harm'. I mention this at the outset, for those of you familiar with 'maternal-fetal conflicts' who might be wondering if I am addressing the same issues. Yes. But I am trying to look at them in a new - and I hope more fruitful - way. I would like to thank the other participants in the Hastings Center's maternal-fetal project - especially those who disageed with me - for being so thought-provoking. And I owe a lasting debt of gratitude to Henry Ruth and Allen Buchanan for their invaluable counsel.The issues explored in this book have unfortunately come to be known as 'maternal-fetal conflicts'. The phrase is unsatisfactory because it is misleading: It places the emphasis on the well-being of the fetus instead of on the born child (who will bear the burden of any harm done prenatally); it assumes a conflict between a pregnant women and her offspring (while the issue is usually more complex and more broadly based); and it incorrectly implies that all pregnant women are appropriately regarded as mothers. For these reasons, I have chosen to avoid the phrase 'matern- fetal conflict' altogether, and will instead speak in terms of 'preventable prenatal harm'. I mention this at the outset, for those of you familiar with 'maternal-fetal conflicts' who might be wondering if I am addressing the same issues. Yes. But I am trying lC$
Add Review