Temporality surveys the ways in which languages of different types refer to past, present, and future events, through an in-depth examination of four major language types: tense-based English, tense-aspect-based Polish, aspect-based Chinese, and mood-based Kalaallisut.
- Cutting-edge research on directly compositional dynamic semantics of languages with and without grammatical tense
- New in-depth analysis of temporal, aspectual, modal, as well as nominal discourse reference
- Presents a novel logical language for representing linguistic meaning (Update with Centering)
- Develops a unified theory of tense, aspect, mood, and person as different types of ‘grammatical centering systems’
List of Figures ix
Acknowledgments xiii
Glosses xv
Introduction 1
Part I Semantic Universals 13
1 Direct Semantic Composition 15
1.1 Simple Type Logic (TL0) 16
1.2 A CG.TL0 Fragment of English 17
1.3 Dynamic Type Logic (DL0) 23
1.4 A CG.DL0 Fragment of English 27
1.5 Centering: A Blind Spot of English-Based Logics 34
2 Nominal Reference with Centering 41
2.1 Center v. Periphery: Anaphora to Structured Lists 42
2.2 Kalaallisut Third Person Inflections as Top-Level Anaphora 48
2.3 Mandarin Third Person Features as Top-Level Anaphora 53
2.4 English Third Person Pronouns as Shallow Anaphora 57
2.5 Simple Update with Centering (UC0) 61
3 Tense as Temporal Centering 67
3.1 Polish Third Person Inflections as Top-Level Anals'