From providential apocalypticism to climate change, this ground-breaking ecocritical study traces the performance history of the storm scene inKing Learto explore our shifting, fraught and deeply ideological relationship with stormy weather across time.
This Contentious Stormoffers a new ecocritical reading of Shakespeare's classic play, illustrating how the storm has been read as a sign of the providential, cosmological, meteorological, psychological, neurological, emotional, political, sublime, maternal, feminine, heroic and chaotic at different points in history. The big ecocritical history charted here reveals the unstable significance of the weather and mobilises details of the play's dramatic narrative to figure the weather as a force within self, society and planet.
Jennifer Mae Hamiltonis a Postdoctoral Research Associate in Gender and Cultural Studies at the University of Sydney, funded by The Seed Box: A MISTRA+FORMAS Environmental Humanities Collaboratory, Link?ping University, Sweden. She also lectures in ecocriticism at New York University, Sydney
Prologue: The Plot
Introduction:The Case forKing Lear
Part 1 - Ecocriticism
Chapter 1: Meteorological Reading
Chapter 2: 'What is the cause of thunder?': The Storm's Three Ambiguities
Chapter 3: Cataclysmic Shame: Three Views of Lear's Mortal Body in the Storm
Part 2 Performance History
Chapter 4: Ecocritical Big History
Chapter 5: The Spectacular Jacobean Theatre
Chapter 6: Storms of Fortune: Industrial Technology and Nahum Tate,
c.1680-c.1900
Chapter 7: Lear's Head: The Rise of the Psychological Metaphor, 1908-1955.
Chapter 8: Towards the Flood, 1962-2016